FAQs

Here are frequently asked questions we receive about our work.

Is there a recording of the technical conference?

Yes, the technical conference is available on the "Download Documents" tab.

Does the RFP require bidding parties to have Network Resource Interconnection Service if the generation being bid is outside of PSO service territory?

No, NRIS is not required.

Is there a DISIS cycle cut off for the generator?

DISIS 2021-001 or earlier.

Will generation located in MISO be considered?

Projects located in Oklahoma are preferred, but projects in Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, and Texas will also be considered. Must interconnect to the SPP system. Projects located outside of these states will not be eligible.

Can you send the confidentiality agreement?

The confidentiality agreement can be found under the "Download Documents" tab.

Is there a preference for Energy storage technology type or duration for the Dover sites? For any of the PSO available sites.

AEP BESS Standards by technology type are outlined within the technical specs that bidders will receive after executing a confidentiality agreement. Duration requirements can be found in Section 3.8.12 of the RFP document.

Does congestion of project POI vs. PSO load bus play into price scoring? If so how?

Congestion costs will be evaluated through the transmission screening analysis within the Economic Analysis. Congestion costs will be included in the Total Cost calculations. See Section 9.2 (Economic Analysis) of the RFP for more details.

For the PSA option, will PSO require the land to be owned by the project or is a lease structure acceptable?

Leases will be accepted. Please refer to Section 3.8.13 of the RFP for more information.

Will any benefit be assigned to projects that can achieve COD prior to December 2027, for example in 2026?

The evaluation will take earlier COD's into account, however, there will be no extra benefit other than value recognized through the Economic Analysis applied to earlier COD projects.

Are proposals for tolling agreements standalone storage not accepted? Are standalone BESS resources eligible for only PSA offers?

Stand-alone, Greenfield BESS resources will be eligible to submit bids under PSA, PPA and CPA construct, except for the projects located at PSO's Dover, Northeastern or Rock Falls sites, which could only participate under a PSA construct. Operating stand-alone storage would be eligible to submit only under a supplemental capacity resource construct, but the bidder may offer energy and ancillary services at their discretion. This will be clarified in the final RFP document.

What is the pricing structure expected for the capacity agreement, particularly for energy storage? Would this be similar to a full tolling agreement (to include energy) or only capacity will be purchased?

Stand-alone, Greenfield BESS resources will be eligible to submit bids under PSA, PPA and CPA construct, except for the projects located at PSO's Dover, Northeastern or Rock Falls sites, which could only participate under a PSA construct. Operating stand-alone storage would be eligible to submit only under a supplemental capacity resource construct, but the bidder may offer energy and ancillary services at their discretion. This will be clarified in the final RFP document.

Will there be a bid fee?

There is no bid fee for this RFP.

Can you comment on how capacity accreditation will be calculated for renewable projects that are being offered with collocated Storage systems?

The ELCC of the different components of a collocated storage system will be calculated separately and then summed. The summation of the separate ELCC's cannot exceed the max MW at the point of interconnection.

What is PSO's expected timing around regulatory approvals?

PSO would expect regulatory approval and resulting appeal period to be approximately 10 months from filing date. Projects are expected to be filed after execution, in the fall of 2024.

If we use the POIs provided by PSO (Dover, Northeastern 1 & 2, and/or Rock Falls do we need to have an SPP queue number/current queue position?

Projects utilizing PSO’s existing interconnection injection rights and/or sites do not need to hold an active SPP Queue position. PSO, not Bidder, will be responsible for managing the interconnection rights and process for this opportunity.

Does "established site control" mean a project must have 100% site control? What would happen in evaluation to a project with 75% site control at the time of submission which had a line of sight on securing control for remaining acreage?

Bidders must have established substantial site control of the proposed project. This may be in the forms outlined in Section 3.8.13 of the RFP. PSO's requirement standard at the bidding phase aligns with SPP's Generator Interconnection Procedure requirements with respect to site control.

Will bidders submitting a PPA bid be required to redline PSO's form PPA - or will PPA negotiations commence after shortlist?

Bidders must submit complete exceptions to PSO's form PPA in order to continue to proceed through the evaluation process (Section 9.1.11)

Is the 1500 MW procurement target and ELCC adjusted number? Follow up to this, how does selecting diverse technologies play into PSO selection criteria, given ELCC & PSO's load shape?

The 1,500 MW is ELCC adjusted accredited capacity. See section 9.3.3 for further details on multiple diversity criteria which will be considered in the non-price scoring.

Will PSO accept consortium "self build" thermal generation proposals at the POI sites?

PSO sites will only entertain energy storage, not thermal.  However, for the NE 1, 2 POI off-site opportunity, we welcome all eligible technologies, including thermal.  If bidders are a consortium, we would ask for a lead bidder and an explanation of how credit support will be handled.

If project is in a later queue, but can meet the COD target, would it still be eligible?

Greenfield projects not utilizing a suprlus interconnection request must be active in SPP Queue Cluster 2021-001 or earlier to be eligible.

How do bidder's submit an "Intent to Bid" ?

PSO requests that Bidders provide a Notice of Intent ("NOI") by 12/11/23. The NOI shall include the project(s) name, technology, location, size (MW) and SPP Queue number. Please submit the NOI through the RFP email address, pso2023asrfp@1898andco.com

For repower projects, a 30-year useful life from a repower date might not be feasible. How is PSO accounting for this?

Treating a repower as an operating resource, the answer depends on the agreement type. For build transfer (PSA) arrangements, the resource must have at least 10 years of remaining operating life (Sect 4.1.5). In the case of PPAs, a repowered resource contract must have a minimum offer term of 15 years (Sect 5.4). Supplemental Capacity Resources can be offered for a maximum term of 15 years (Sect 5.4).

In regards to proof of site control for obtaining the CA. Is a recorded Memorandum of Lease is acceptable proof of site control?

Yes, a recorded Memorandum of Lease is acceptable proof of site control.

Will PSO accept proposals for the sale of development rights?

PSO will not accept proposals for sale of development rights at this time.

When submitting an Intent to Bid, does this bind us to submit bids for every project that is listed?

Bidders are not bound to submit bids for the projects listed within their Notice of Intent ("NOI").

When can site visits for each PSO Owned location (Northeastern, Dover and Rock Falls) be scheduled?

A visit in mid-December will be scheduled for NE 1,2. The site visit will be limited to bidders.  If interested, please notify 1898 & Co. through the RFP email (pso2023asrfp@1898andco.com) for more details.  Materials will be distributed to bidders including agenda, parking, and PPE safety requirements.  Site visits are not currently planned for Dover and Rock Falls due to the simplistic nature of the sites.  If desired, bidders can simply drive past if needed, as nearly the entire site(s) can be viewed from the roads with the view being unencumbered.

Can AEP provide us with an Approved Vendor List (AVL) for the Main Power Transformers? Is AEP willing to accept vendors that are not on the AVL and if so, what does that process look like to add a vendor?

An Approved Vendor List for Main Power Transformers is included as a part of the technical specs available to bidders. At a minimum, the proposed vendor(s) would need to meet the technical requirements in the specification. The vendor(s) would also need to demonstrate credit-worthiness, undergo a factory visit, and pass assessment. The timeframe for this review can take several months, and so will not be completed prior to bids being submitted.

Section 2.5 of the draft RFP states "For PSA Proposals, while qualifying for Federal Tax Credits is not an Eligibility and Threshold Requirement (Section 9.1) for participating in the RFP, the value brought to the Proposals in buying down the cost of energy by utilization of these tax credits is significant, and is included in the Company’s Economic Analysis (Section 9.2) and ranking of each of the respective Proposals." Later, Section 3.8.14 states "Proposals for non-thermal bids must comply with Prevailing Wage and Apprenticeship Requirements (PWAR) providing full value Federal Tax Credits (e.g., PTCs and ITCs) under the Inflation Reduction Act. Bidders should explain in detail any additional Federal Tax Credits available to proposed Projects associated with energy community or domestic content qualification (Bonus Credits)." Could you please provide further clarity on bid requirements regarding ITC? Would standalone storage proposals be required to comply with PWAR and obtain full ITC and Bonus Credits?

Tax benefits support project economics and are recognized as a part of the RFP valuation, however,  PSO recognizes that each project has unique circumstances. Qualification for tax benefits such as PTCs and ITCs are not required.  Where a project is expected to qualify for Federal Tax Credits (including any Bonus Credits), PSO requests that be stated, along with means of qualification. PWAR  compliance requirements are based on project start of constuction and in service dates.

In Cases of Repower of existing sites, will PSCO consider the market-based value of the incremental MWh relative to existing contracts? In other words, if a wind site can produce 10% more energy via a repower, but such production is forecasted to occur when merchant prices are 2x higher than the average wind generation profile, how will PSCO account for this?

Yes. PSO will value all wind bids based on an expected hourly energy production shape times expected hourly energy prices. 

How will PSCO account for reliability of resource, and resource diversification. In cases of combined technology, ie solar and wind together under one IA, there is additional generation certainty and minimized risk due to outages and solar/wind resource. How is this reflected in the valuation methodology. Further, for an operating plant with existing generation data, PSCO likely will experience a benefit in certainty of wind resource.

PSO will evalute such co-located or hybrid bids in accordance with SPP's tariff provisions for Surplus Interconnection. The output of co-located Parent + Surplus generation will be analyzed at up to the IA limit, and will be valued at expected hourly energy prices. 

How will PSCO account for the benefit of high capacity factor utilization of a project with an existing interconnection agreement? In the event for example surplus solar is added to an existing wind interconnection agreement, the cost and schedule risks are materially lower than standard projects in the SPP queue subject to price swings and schedule uncertainty.

In cases with multiple resources behind a single interconnection, PSO will evaluate the combined energy production in the economic analysis, considering the hourly impacts of each resource on the other's energy production.  Interconnection status of such projects will be one of many considerations in the overall risk assessment. 

For existing contracts, how does PSCO account for the financial burden to PSCO associated with existing assets curtailment reimbursement (if applicable), and the potential benefit of restructuring.

To the extent contract restructuring proposals are submitted into this RFP, potential benefits such as the one mentioned in the question will be considered.

How is PSCO accounting for the value of solar or battery capacity that may be deployed in the near term? In the event of shortages in capacity in over the next few years, is PSCO valuing near term capacity, for a 2025 COD date, in a different way than, for example, a 2028 COD date?

For proposals with differing in service date options for a single asset, separate economic and risk analysis will be prepared beginning on each in service date. 

Given the option to submit proposals for either a 12/15/2027 or 12/15/2028 COD, what COD should be assumed for energy storage proposals at the Dover, Northeastern and Rock Falls sites? Does PSO have a preference?

All else equal, PSO would prefer the 12/15/2027 COD.

Can PSO share the ELCC methodology (average, marginal, critical hours, etc.) that are currently being used or are expected to be used by SPP to determine the number of MWs that the Company will be credited? Can PSO share the accreditation year that they expect to use to evaluate the number of MWs that the Company will be credited?

PSO will employ a technology-specific ELCC curve, which reflects the expected average ELCC values, by year for solar, wind, and battery storage resources. The ELCC curve is developed by PSO employing methodology consistent with SPP's ELCC methodology. All wind/solar/storage bids will be evaluated using the same wind/solar/storage ELCC curve.  

Does PSO accept projects in queues other than SPP that will joint SPP in the near future(2026-27)?

PSO will accept projects that will be deemed deliverable to SPP and qualify as accredited capacity under SPP resource adequacy rules.

In section 6.6 of the RFP, it references not getting the form CA without providing additional information. Since the CA was available on the RFP site, can you explain what this is for?

As identified, the form CA has been made available through the RFP website for all bidders. Ultimately, the information mentioned in Section 6.6 is required in the CA execution process and/or NOI process.

What is the code for PSO's LMP price node/load zone?

Area Code 520 is used to designate the AEP West load hub in SPP load flow models.  For LMP settlement purposes code 10012 (AEPM_CSWS) is used for the AEP West Load Zone.

Do proposals for storage projects need to be inclusive of augmentation?

Energy storage proposals are required to provide its augmentation plan per the Battery Storage Design Criteria Data Sheet in Appendix J of the RFP.

If a bidder submits various designs for one individual project, does there need to be a separate Project Summary form (Appendix A) for each design?

Yes, a bidder must submit a complete Appendix A for each bid/design.

Similar to the requirement for wind resources, is there a requirement that solar production estimates need to be prepared by an independent consultant as well?

Solar Resources are required to attach an 8760 calendar year hourly energy forecast, net of all losses using the Company’s form spreadsheet (SolarEnergyInputSheet_2023.xls). Bidders should also provide the corresponding PVSyst or comparable energy modeling output, and Auxiliary Load and Station Power the Project expects to consume (Appendix I).

Will there be a virtual Q&A or site walk through option for those who might be unable to attend? Either the same day or on a later date?

Site visit Q&A will be posted to the RFP website. The slide deck from the site visit will also be distributed for those who request it and have executed a NDA.

For operating assets, are bidders required to have section A12 completed (related to Environmental)? Or is this more for new projects in which environmental impacts need to be taken into consideration?

Please refer to Section 8.21 of the RFP to see what operational project bids must include.

Are operating assets required to submit independent reviews as indicated in Section 3.8.4, or can operational data be provided?

Please refer to Section 8.21 of the RFP to see what operational project bids must include.

If the developer is bidding a repower on an existing asset, will the developer need to completely scrap/rebuild all aspects of the project to AEP technical specifications or can the developer utilize the existing resources/design? Additionally, if existing resources/design can be utilized, what standards/specs do they need to meet? Mainly asking about the 30-year design life.

Operational resources built to specifications other than those provided within this RFP (Appendix F) will be considered and reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Exceptions to AEP's technical specifications will be evaluated. Operational resources must have a minimum of 10 years of remaining operational life based on initial design standards to participate in the RFP (Section 4.1.5).

Are projects offering exclusively PPA Products obligated to satisfy the AEP GENeration Facility Standards (Appendix F)?

Projects offering exclusively PPA products are not required to comply with AEP Generation Facility Standards (Appendix F).

Are 3rd party wind reports required for all wind projects being bid, or is this only required for wind projects being bid as a Build Transfer?

Independent wind reports are only required for projects being bid as Build Transfer Agreements.

I will not be able to attend the site visit. Will there be a virtual portion, or any additional meetings or information that would be provided to those who are unable to attend but are interested in the site.

Site visit Q&A will be posted to the RFP website. The slide deck from the site visit will also be distributed for those who request it and have executed a NDA. A second site visit will depend on demand

Where will the collector substation access road be located?

Developer to propose location(s) with submittal of the General Arrangements within the proposal. AEP to review.

When are progress payments expected to be made?

Please refer to Sections 4.4 and 4.5 of the RFP.

Can AEP summarize the locations and voltage levels of the circuits within the allocated BESS space depicted on the General Arrangement in Appendix R-A, and for circuits that are existing between the NE 1,2 existing substation and allocated BESS space?

The drawing will be added to Appendix R-A. Bidder must execute an NDA to view the drawing.

Is it possible to use the proposed NE 1,2 BESS footprint for the substation location (project substation) to interconnect an external project to the NE 1,2 substation POI?

As a base proposal, bidders should assume that their proposed offsite project will host their own project substation.  

As an alternative proposal, bidders can assume that their proposed offsite project includes a gen-tie to the Northeastern Site – Units 1 & 2 (see allocated space identified in Appendix R) where the project substation can be located.

Can AEP share the height of poles located adjacent to the helipad and any other spacing requirements?

The height of the poles has not been surveyed. Bidders are to follow spacing requirements within the BESS specifications in Appendix F.

For the NE 1,2 POI, are there restrictions proposing a hybrid facility combining an off-site project (Non-BESS technology) and an on-site BESS project at NE 1,2 while utilizing the NE 1,2 allocated space within the Appendix-R General Arrangement for the project substation?

Sections 3.8.2.2 and 3.8.3 of the RFP provide sizing guidelines for the Northeastern Site – Units 1 & 2.  

Bidders are welcome to provide proposals of hybrid facilities that combine an off-site project with an onsite BESS project, but the interconnection rights at the Northeastern Site – Units 1 & 2 POI remain finite.

Regarding placement of a project substation for such a hybrid proposal, bidders can assume that the project substation can be sited on the Northeastern Site – Units 1 & 2 (see allocated space identified in Appendix R).

For a repower project, we are planning to submit technical and commercial specifications the same way we would an operational project, just with our new turbine scenario. Does AEP have any objections/adjustments to Bidder taking this route?

This is acceptable, however, the proposal must contain complete and sufficient information that allows the proposal to be evaluated appropriately.

Is there an Appendix that requires energy production profile information? If so, can you please confirm which?

For Wind Resources, production information must be provided in Appendix H and for Solar Resources, production information must be provided in Appendix I.

For the Northeastern, Dover, and Rock Falls BESS offerings, would the bidder be responsible for construction of these facilities or would PSO be responsible for construction?

Bidder would be responsible for constructing the BESS facilities for these sites under a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA).

For PPA bids, are bidders required to submit Appendix M (Land Lease, Decommissioning and Property Taxes form)?

PPA proposals are not required to submit Appendix M.

In reference to section 4.4 of the RFP document can you please share how firm PSO is in regards to first payment occurring at mechanical completion of the energy storage project? Our company’s standard payment structure requires several progress payments prior to mechanical completion. Is PSO open to negotiate payment terms?

The Company (PSO) will not make any progress payments prior to Mechanical Completion (Section 4.4).

Can the PSO team please opine as to whether certain vendors are approved for this RFP?

Please refer to GEN-4570 BESS Technical Specification Rev 6 Final in Appendix F for the Approved Vendor List. At a minimum, proposed vendor(s) not on the Approved Vendor List would need to meet the technical requirements in the specification. The vendor(s) would also need to demonstrate credit-worthiness, undergo a factory visit, and pass assessment. The timeframe for this review can take several months, and so will not be completed prior to bids being submitted.

Could further elaboration be provided on the requirement in section 4.6 that states "Prices must be firm, representing a best and final bid. Proposals and bid pricing must be valid for at least 270 days after the Proposal Due Date."? As BESS pricing is largely dependent on commodity costs (I.e. lithium) pricing fluctuates regularly and is unlikely to hold firm for 270 days. Could the 270 days of validity timeframe be reevaluated?

PSO has evaluated this period and has modified it from 180 days to 270 days. PSO is looking for firm pricing for this period because it represents submittal to regulatory filing timeline.

Would PSO be open to PPA or PSA bid pricing that would allow for price adjustment (e.g., indexed pricing)? Or does bid pricing have to be fixed in nature?

Please refer to the form PSA regarding price adjustments. For PPA's, as stated in 5.2.1, "Bid Price must be a fixed, non-escalated, “all-in”, around-the-clock price ($/MWh) for the entire term of the agreement."

Could the bidder provide an augmentation schedule to meet 100% of energy capacity at the POI throughout all 20 year of the Battery energy storage system (BESS) lifetime? This augmentation schedule would differ from the degradation criteria outlined in the "Battery Storage Design Criteria Data Sheet_ PSO 2023" document in appendix J.

Bidders must follow the augmentation schedule outlined in Appendix J for their base bid but are welcome to submit an additional, optional offer proposing a different augmentation schedule.

Please advise if you are only interested in new build projects and/or purchase of asset agreements.

As part of this RFP, PSO will consider Proposals for greenfield projects, operating projects and projects that would utilize a portion of the existing interconnection rights of existing PSO sites.

In the cycles section of "Battery Storage Design Criteria Data Sheet_ PSO 2023" of Appendix J, the maximum cycles per year is assumed to be 300. DEPCOM has experience designing and building BESS systems to withstand 365 cycles per year. Could the BESS be designed for 365 cycles/year instead of 300?

Bidders must follow the required cycles per year outlined in Appendix J for their base bid but are welcome to submit an additional, optional offer proposing a different amount of cycles per year.

For the Northeastern site, there are railway tracks and an access road passing through the area designated as a Battery energy storage system area. Is this railroad and road undergoing deconstruction or is the EPC to consider these areas as non-buildable? Could easements for the road and railway be provided?

The current railway tracks within the BESS footprint in Appendix R-A can be removed by developer if elected, with no need for replacement.  Access roads within the BESS footprint can also be re-configured to meet the needs of the BESS facility.  If altering roads approaching the BESS footprint, AEP would need to review upon submittal.

Would PSO accept a bid with vendor on PSO's Battery Approved vendor list?

An Approved Vendor List for BESS is included as a part of the technical specs available to bidders. At a minimum, the proposed vendor(s) would need to meet the technical requirements in the specification. The vendor(s) would also need to demonstrate credit-worthiness, undergo a factory visit, and pass assessment. The timeframe for this review can take several months, and so will not be completed prior to bids being submitted.

Will you be posting Exhibit L - Emerging Tech Data Reivew Form on the portal?

Appendix L is now available for bidders that have executed an NDA.

What Point of Receipt in PSO's system would PSO contemplate for a wind project located in southwestern Kansas?

PSO would evaluate at the Point of Interconnect and model future congestion scenarios for delivery to PSO's system/load zone.

For PSA bids that include storage (hybrid or standalone), are bidders required to offer both 4-hour and 6-hour designs? Vice versa for PPA bids, are bidders required to both 4-hour and 6-hour designs, or is it up to the bidder's discretion on duration?

Per Section 3.8.12 of the RFP, the base Standalone Storage proposal must include both a 4-hour and 6-hour storage duration. PSO will also consider proposals with durations of 8 hours or longer. 

If we only plan to submit a PPA bid for a wind project, what information in Appendix H is applicable? As some of the items listed appear to be more geared towards PSA bids?

Bidder must include an 8760 calendar year hourly energy forecast (P50), net of all losses using the Company's form spreadsheet, EnergyInputSheet_20230324.xlsx in Appendix H.

Are we supposed to submit any of the materials in Exhibit N at this juncture? Or is this just a list of items that will need to be completed if selected?

A complete Appendix N must be filled out as part of the base proposal.

How does PSO plan to address the fact that SPP's ELCC accreditation methodology for wind and solar is currently not final (given FERC rejection of SPP's ELCC methodology in March 2023), and that the ELCC accreditation calculations are expected to be changing year-over-year (creating dynamic values over time, introducing volumetric changes, notably for wind generation) given that bids are to be fixed and firm for the full term proposed? How will PSO treat this in Capacity Purchase Agreements?

The Company expects to use a long-term projection of class-average ELCCs for new generation which are based on SPP region-wide modeling of the future composition of the regional generation fleet. That modeling evaluates each resource type’s penetration rate and forecasted output at the time of SPP’s peaks, in order to project ELCCs over time. For existing resources, historical output may be used to further adjust the forecasted ELCC values as appropriate.  The resulting ELCC forecasts recognize the impact of the volumetric penetration levels as they are forecasted to change over time.   

For Capacity Purchases Agreement, the RFP responders are expected to provide accredited capacity MW values that PSO will contract for.

Per the FAQ's "Solar Resources are required to attach an 8760 calendar year hourly energy forecast, net of all losses using the Company’s form spreadsheet (SolarEnergyInputSheet_2023.xls)." Where is this spreadsheet located?

Both the Modeling Input Sheet and the Energy Input Sheet are now available for bidders that have executed an NDA.

For the Purchase and Sale Agreement option, is PSO open to being a partner in a Limited Liability Company (LLC) with a Tax Equity Investor (TEI)? In this scenario, PSO would purchase 100% of Class B units (owned by the RFP Proponent), and the TEI would continue to own 100% of Class A units. Post-PSO acquisition of 100% of Class B units, the resulting LLC would be a partnership (governed by an LLCA) between PSO and the TEI. Thanks,

PSO will not accept proposals in which there is an ongoing partnership with a Tax Equity Investor at this time.

Section 4.1.1 (PSA Bid Structure) of the RFP states that “Wind Projects must be designed for a minimum 30-year life” and that “Pricing for Wind Projects must include, but not be limited to, approved wind turbine generators with 30-year life certifications (as sited) from manufacturer…”. In Section 9.19 (RFP Proposal) it states that “New Wind…must have a minimum design life of 30 years”. Does this requirement for “30-year life certification from manufacturer” apply only to NEW wind projects, or also to operational wind? Or does this requirement only apply to PSA bids – if so, just for new wind projects?

For PSA proposals, new Wind, Solar and Gas Projects must have a minimum design life of 30 years per Section 9.1.9 of the RFP. Operational resources must have a minimum of 10 years of remaining operational life based on initital design standards to participate in the RFP (Section 4.1.5).

For PPA proposals, the minimum design life must meet or exceed the minimum contract term for Wind, Solar, greenfield Energy Storage and greenfield Gas Resource PPAs (15 years).

Please confirm that Wind SOW Rev. 5 (in Appendix F) is only for PSA bids -- this is presumed as the first paragraph states it is a schedule “attached to the Purchase and Sale Agreement”. Please confirm that Wind SOW Rev. 5 is not applicable to operational wind projects (the document is written in future tense, as if for new builds).

Wind SOW Rev. 5 is only required for PSA proposals. Please refer to Section 8.21 of the RFP for the required information needed for operational proposals.

The Schedules and Exhibits of Appendix D - BESS PSA are not included in the document provided in the RFP website. Could you please provide these schedules and exhibits, as they contain information that impacts bid pricing, particularly Exhibit M - Scope of Work and Specifications.

Exhibits to the form PSAs and PPAs will be addressed during negotiations once projects are shortlisted.

What is the preferred approach, submission of a 70 bid with the option to increase by 30, or submission of a 100 bid?

AEP recommends that two bids be submitted separately, one for a 70 MW bid, and another for a 100 MW bid.

For Appendix E - Solar / Wind REPA Forms, under section 11.1, there is a Seller Security Fund established as a $100,000 per MW requirement. Does this hold for both the construction and operating term of each project offered as a PPA?

The Seller Security Fund is a requirement for both the construction and operating term of each project offered as a PPA.

Section 4.2.1 requires that PSA proposal pricing must include the costs associated with “a minimum of two-year comprehensive warranty from a creditworthy entity for all equipment, including design, labor and materials, and fitness for purpose”. Please confirm this is required only for new wind projects, not operational wind projects.

The two-year warranty requirement stated in Section 4.2.1. does not apply to operational wind projects.  However, Section 8.21 requires Operational Projects to provide a list of all warranties.

Section 9.2 states, in the definition of “Total Cost”, that “Transmission and Congestion costs will be considered for “PSA Proposals”, but this language is absent in the next sentence, for “PPA bids”. Please clarify if Transmission and Congestions costs will also be considered for PPA proposals.

Transmission and Congestion Costs will be considered for both PSA Proposals and PPA Proposals.

Could the easement/path for the gas pipeline crossing through "the southernmost section of the project boundary" be provided? This gas pipeline is mentioned in the "PSO_Final_NEU1and2_ConstraintsAnalysis_2023-10-13" document in appendix R-N.

The easement is now included in Appendix R-A and Appendix R-N.

Are BESS projects that are co-located with solar eligible for a Power Purchase Agreement?

Greenfield BESS projects that are co-located with solar resources are eligible for a Power Purchase Agreement.

Existing natural gas generators are NOT eligible to participate in the PPA portion of the RFP. Only new gas generators may participate in the PPA portion of the RFP. Existing gas generators may participate in the PSA portion of the RFP. Is my understanding correct?

Yes, this is correct. Operating natural gas proposals can also submit supplemental capacity offers with optional tolling arrangements at bidder's discretion.

Given the volume of land agreements that any one project may have, will a summarized detail of agreements listing the agreement type, landowner, acreage, and dates suffice for proof of site control?

Please refer to Appendix N for proof of site control requirements.

Is PSO considering extending the RFP due date given the additional site visit planned?

No, an extension is not being considered. Proposal Due Date is January 29, 2024.

Is the fuel tank active?

The fuel tank has been abandoned (Northeastern 1&2 reference).

Under the Wind REPA (Appendix E) Section 5.6_Scheduling Arrangements, the REPA doesn't specify whether it is the Seller or Purchaser determining the day-ahead offer price for the asset. Please clarify which Party determines the day-ahead price offered into SPP?

The Purchaser determines the day-ahead price offered into SPP.

With respect to the AEP West Load Zone (AEPM_CSWS), what does CSWS stand for?

CSWS stands for Central and Southwest Services.

Regarding Appendix I and the Solar Modeling Input Sheet, under Site Information the form is asking bidders to provide a map showing buildings or objects shading the array. Could PSO please define and/or provide examples of types of "small objects" that should be noted. Given the nature of this ask, this could be intensive to prepare.

For the Solar Modeling Input Sheet, an object or building is shading the array if any portion of the object or building is within 3.5 feet straight line distance from the nearest portion of the array for every 1 foot of relative height difference above the array table. This means a 3.5: 1 ratio of distance to relative height.

If we plan to bid in a wind resource for a PPA and have one of the offtaker's term ending at 12/31/2028, would you accept a PPA starting on 1/1/2029?

In order to meet Eligibility and Threshold Requirements (Section 9.1), projects must have an expected COD or term start date by 12/15/2027, or alternatively 12/15/2028.

Is there a penalty for withdrawing from the RFP during the review period (or at any time)?

There is a no financial penalty for withdrawing from the RFP.

The link in Appendix G is not working. Please provide the Requirements for Connection of Facilities. Is this a requirement that applies to PPA products?

Please refer to updated link below:
https://www.aep.com/assets/docs/requiredpostings/TransmissionStudies/Requirements/AEP_Interconnection_Requirements_Rev5.pdf

In the RFP FAQ section it is stated, "Completed interconnection study as follows: Except for operating resources, those holding existing interconnection rights and those utilizing PSO's existing interconnection injection rights and/or PSO sites (as specified in Sections 3.8.2 and 3.8.3), projects must be active in SPP Queue Cluster 2021-001 or earlier. Projects in later queue clusters will not be able to participate in this RFP." If a Bidder's project is not in SPP Queue Cluster 2021-001 or earlier but is able to achieve the RFP secondary COD target date would the Bidder's project still be excluded from the RFP?

Projects that have submitted a traditional interconnection request must be active in SPP Queue Cluster 2021-001 or earlier per the RFP. This mandate does not apply for projects that require supplemental interconnection requests and can meet the COD requirement of the RFP.

Is the "Gen 4570 BESS Technical Specification Rev. 6" in Appendix F for PSA products only? I.e. if we are offering a solar PPA with storage option (not a PSA), does the BESS proposal have to satisfy the standards in Appendix F - or only comply with the completed Battery Storage Design Criteria Data Sheet (Appendix J)?

A BESS PPA proposal does not have to satisfy the standards in Appendix F, however, it should complete Appendix J and provide the project's proposed standards.

The PSA references an Exhibit W – provisionally approved contractor list. Is this exhibit part of the bid materials?

Exhibit W of the PSA is not part of the bid materials. This will be provided once projects are shortlisted.

What are the credit requirements for the RFP?

Bidders must complete Appendix B (Bidder's Credit-Related Information). Actual credit support requirements will be contemplated within the executed agreements.

Can you please provide kmz files for each of the on-site standalone BESS locations (Rock Falls, Dover and Northeastern Units 1 & 2)?

The kmz files are now in the appropriate Appendices of the RFP (Northeastern 1 & 2: Appendix R-A, Dover: Appendix S, Rock Falls Appendix T).

The table under Section 5.4 of the RFP indicates that greenfield storage resources are eligible for PPA bids. Could you please provide the form Power Purchase Agreement that would apply for greenfield standalone storage resources?

A form BESS PPA/Tolling Term Sheet is now available in Appendix E.

Will dual MPTs be required?

One operational MPT and one spare MPT are required.

What is PSO’s preference for providing commercial and/or legal exceptions to the Form Power Purchase Agreement when offering standalone storage as a capacity, energy, ancillary, etc. resource?

Please use the BESS PPA/Tolling Term Sheet to provide any exceptions the proposal may have.

I would like to clarify whether Appendix G (AEP Requirements for Connection of Facilities) is required for resources that are not connecting to AEP’s system, but are still on the SPP system?

Appendix G is not required for resources that are not connecting to AEP's system.

What form contract should bidders review and propose changes to for Supplemental Capacity Proposals?

Please refer to the form EEI documents in Appendix E for Supplemental Capacity Proposals.

For a Stand-alone, Greenfield BESS resource eligible to submit bids under the PPA and CPA construct which Appendix Document should the Bidder redline for the Bidder's proposal submission? Appendix E (Solar REPA) or Appendix E (Wind REPA)? Bidder does not see in the RFP download documents list a PPA ("Toll") for a SA BESS resource or CPA Appendix Contract document to redline.

Appendix E now has a form BESS PPA/Tolling Agreement Term Sheet as well as EEI form docs (EEI Cover Sheet & Collateral Annex. Paragraph 10) for Capacity Purchase Agreements. Please use those form documents.

For a PPA proposal, what are the transmission wheeling cost requirements for an NRIS project just outside of AEP's service territory but interconnecting into SPP?

There is no specific “wheeling” cost attributed to a resource outside of the AEP Transmission Zone. Any transmission related expenses related to the interconnection of the plant would be determined as part of the Generator Interconnection activities. Transmission upgrade costs directly assigned to service from the customers, if any, would not be determined until a transmission service requests. Any such costs would not be exclusively attributable to the resource being connected to the AEP Zone or not being connected to the AEP zone, instead, they would be based on the physical characteristics of the SPP Transmission System from the generator interconnection point to the AEP/PSO load settlement location. 

Could you please clarify what items under "8.21 PSA bids for Operational Projects" (copied below) are required/not required for exclusively PPA proposals? For example, does a PPA bid require 8760 production data? 8.21 PSA bids for Operational Projects must contain: · Historical operational information over the last 5 years (or less if commercial operation was more recent), including: · Production data (8760) and availability as well as downtime issues and outlook · Congestion and curtailment o Environmental issues and violations o Safety issues o NERC violations and resolution o Major scheduled and unscheduled maintenance matters as well as resolution o Community relations / external affairs issues o Detailed annual operations budgets, including forecasted v. actual · Environmental and permitting summary · List and description of any outstanding legal matters · Facility Site Plan and General Arrangement · List of all warranties · Staffing · Summary of material contracts (interconnection agreement, operations & maintenance agreements, etc.) and confirmation that the project is in compliance with all such contracts, including land leases · Confirmation of whether the project holds firm transmission service and, if applicable, gas transportation capacity and gas supply · Property tax abatements and/or payments in lieu of taxes · Commercial operation date · For solar or wind projects, a description of the tax qualification strategy used to secure Federal Tax Credits for the project

Operational PPA proposals should include historical operational information over the last 5 years (or less if commercial operation was more recent), including: 
• Production data (8760) and availability as well as downtime issues and outlook
• Congestion and curtailment.

Proposals should also have confirmation of whether the project holds firm transmission service and, if applicable, gas transportation capacity and gas supply.  For solar or wind projects, a description of the tax qualification strategy used to secure Federal Tax Credits for the project should be provided as well.

I wanted to confirm if separate appendices are required for different bids iterations. Can we capture all details within a single set of appendices? Project intended to bid. •70 MW PV •70 MW PV + 70 MW BESS (4-hour) •70 MW PV + 70 MW BESS (6-hour)

Please submit separate appendices for different bid iterations so the bid can be evaluated appropriately.

Is the "Solar Data Review Form" referenced in Appendix I different than the "Solar Energy Input Sheet" or "Solar Modeling Input Sheet"?

The "Solar Modeling Input Sheet" replaced the "Solar Data Review Form". The "Solar Energy Input Sheet" and the "Solar Modeling Input Sheet" are the correct documents.

For any proposed standalone storage bids onsite at Dover, Rock Falls or Northeast Units 1 & 2, must those proposals include all relevant information on the Appendix Q Proposal Content Checklist or only Appendix J (Energy Storage Resource Information)?

Proposed standalone storage bids at Dover, Rock Falls or Northeastern Units 1 & 2 must complete the respective resource appendices of Appendix Q as well as Appendix J.

Recognizing PSO is making Units 1 & 2 of Northeastern available in this RFP, is there also a surplus interconnection opportunity at Unit 3 given its anticipated retirement in 2026?

A surplus interconnection opportunity at Northeastern - Unit 3 will not be made available to the market.

The RFP document in Appendix A indicates that supplemental capacity for energy storage is priced in $/MWh. This is unusual as this product is generally priced as $/kW-mo. Can you confirm this should be priced similar to the Gas offers in $/kW-mo?

Please price BESS in $/kW-mo.

Appendix A references a Bundled Price ($/MWh) for a Wind or Solar Base Proposal with Storage Option, yet the BESS Tolling Agreement states that Purchaser will pay Seller the storage contract price equal to $/kW/month for all storage products. Can you please advise?

For a bid with a base proposal of wind or solar with a storage option, please price the wind or solar in $/MWh and the storage in $/kW-mo.

Can PSO define what is factored into union labor for the proposal bid pricing?

The inclusion or exclusion of union labor within the bid price is not a standalone scoring item, but information being sought for project background.

Will projects outside of the three mentioned sites with interconnection rights, with a COD before the cutoff date, but queued after DISIS Gen 2021-001 be reviewed as nonconforming bids, or will they be denied outright?

Projects that have submitted a traditional interconnection request must be active in SPP Queue Cluster 2021-001 or earlier per the RFP. This mandate does not apply for projects that require supplemental interconnection requests and can meet the COD requirement of the RFP.